I have a few comments/questions about the post: 1) Why is a mobile phone random number generator good enough to generate encryption...
I have a few comments/questions about the post: 1) Why is a mobile phone random number generator good enough to generate encryption keys, but not good enough to generate one time pads? What extra weaknesses do one time pads expose? 2) For their 2nd point, Zendo has said that the pad exchange happens locally ( device to device ). So you would need to be in the room to eavesdrop. So the transport mechanism they choose there is a little bit less of a risk I think. 3) Their 3rd point also doesn't seem to be that big enough of a deal to warrant the tone... if sha256 is broken, a man in the middle would be able to corrupt messages, but not in a meaningful way ( ie switching yes to no ), it would just look like garbage to the other person... I think #1 is probably the biggest issue, I'd like to understand it a bit more.
Posted by utnick on Mar 26, 2015, 12:57 PM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
I have a few comments/questions about the post: 1) Why is a mobile phone random number generator good enough to generate encryption...
I have a few comments/questions about the post: 1) Why is a mobile phone random number generator good enough to generate encryption keys, but not good enough to generate one time pads? What extra weaknesses do one time pads expose? 2) For their 2nd point, Zendo has said that the pad exchange happens locally ( device to device ). So you would need to be in the room to eavesdrop. So the transport mechanism they choose there is a little bit less of a risk I think. 3) Their 3rd point also doesn't seem to be that big enough of a deal to warrant the tone... if sha256 is broken, a man in the middle would be able to corrupt messages, but not in a meaningful way ( ie switching yes to no ), it would just look like garbage to the other person... I think #1 is probably the biggest issue, I'd like to understand it a bit more.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.