> If anything should be open and free, it's art.
> If anything should be open and free, it's art. I'm not sure that would work with all types of art and for all types of artists. If an author spends a year writing a book, how is he supposed to make a living? A few authors can attend sci-fi and fantasy conferences, but most can't make much money from live performances, t-shirts etc. It's not fair to limit the ways an artist can make a living. If writing was limited to hobbyists we would lose a lot of good literature that can only come from total dedication to their work. The same can also be said for musicians. Consumers have a limited amount of time and money they can spend on concerts, donations and t-shirts. The current copyright and distribution system is broken, but art has always been a product that can be sold and controlled by the artists, so why should it be free-as-in-speech just because it can be copied digitally? The main issue with today's system is that artists no longer have enough control of the distribution and copyright is something that can be transferred and outlive the original artists. The only way art can be free-as-in-speech is to build a post scarcity world where everyone is free to do whatever they want.
Posted by qw on May 29, 2015, 10:33 PM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,000 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
NewI wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
> If anything should be open and free, it's art.
> If anything should be open and free, it's art. I'm not sure that would work with all types of art and for all types of artists. If an author spends a year writing a book, how is he supposed to make a living? A few authors can attend sci-fi and fantasy conferences, but most can't make much money from live performances, t-shirts etc. It's not fair to limit the ways an artist can make a living. If writing was limited to hobbyists we would lose a lot of good literature that can only come from total dedication to their work. The same can also be said for musicians. Consumers have a limited amount of time and money they can spend on concerts, donations and t-shirts. The current copyright and distribution system is broken, but art has always been a product that can be sold and controlled by the artists, so why should it be free-as-in-speech just because it can be copied digitally? The main issue with today's system is that artists no longer have enough control of the distribution and copyright is something that can be transferred and outlive the original artists. The only way art can be free-as-in-speech is to build a post scarcity world where everyone is free to do whatever they want.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.