If consciousness even turns out to be a real thing, it probably isn't extremely complicated.
If consciousness even turns out to be a real thing, it probably isn't extremely complicated. I'm not claiming that neural networks are AGI, but they are significant progress towards it. >Are human beings safe? They have empathy and don't have unlimited power, so yes for the most part. But that's not really relevant. >So, how can you restrict research into it? No one even understands it. Thus, you can't. Everyone is free to do as they please in way of research and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Again I'm not advocating for it, but if the government wanted to ban AI research, they could. Sure rebels could study in secret, just like they can with human cloning or bioweapons, nukes, etc. But for the most part lone rebels working on their own in secret never accomplish anything and real work requires funding and peer review. >But, all of a sudden, it's time to put restrictions on A.I? Poppycock. When AGI is broken into, the [run] button will be hit and that will be that. What, is Elon Musk going to pull the plug? Provide me some definite way you can restrict the coming of AGI and I'll resign my view. Again, we aren't trying to stop AI, that was something you brought up. We are trying to create "Friendly AI", i.e. AI that shares human values and won't simply turn the universe into paperclips. And it's very important that we solve this problem before we invent working AI.
Posted by Houshalter on May 8, 2015, 4:17 AM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
If consciousness even turns out to be a real thing, it probably isn't extremely complicated.
If consciousness even turns out to be a real thing, it probably isn't extremely complicated. I'm not claiming that neural networks are AGI, but they are significant progress towards it. >Are human beings safe? They have empathy and don't have unlimited power, so yes for the most part. But that's not really relevant. >So, how can you restrict research into it? No one even understands it. Thus, you can't. Everyone is free to do as they please in way of research and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Again I'm not advocating for it, but if the government wanted to ban AI research, they could. Sure rebels could study in secret, just like they can with human cloning or bioweapons, nukes, etc. But for the most part lone rebels working on their own in secret never accomplish anything and real work requires funding and peer review. >But, all of a sudden, it's time to put restrictions on A.I? Poppycock. When AGI is broken into, the [run] button will be hit and that will be that. What, is Elon Musk going to pull the plug? Provide me some definite way you can restrict the coming of AGI and I'll resign my view. Again, we aren't trying to stop AI, that was something you brought up. We are trying to create "Friendly AI", i.e. AI that shares human values and won't simply turn the universe into paperclips. And it's very important that we solve this problem before we invent working AI.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.