Interesting syntax, a bit SQLish but..
Interesting syntax, a bit SQLish but.. friendlier? The source link is broken unfortunately, I'm wondering how performant it is. It made me immediately think of articles recently discussing using plain text manipulation through tools like awk, sed, cut, and cat as opposed to the current batch of distributed processing tools. A language like this strikes me as a step up from those tools in terms of writing readable and expressive data manipulation and a comfortable step down from complicated object notations.
Posted by whistlerbrk on Feb 19, 2015, 7:25 PM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
Interesting syntax, a bit SQLish but..
Interesting syntax, a bit SQLish but.. friendlier? The source link is broken unfortunately, I'm wondering how performant it is. It made me immediately think of articles recently discussing using plain text manipulation through tools like awk, sed, cut, and cat as opposed to the current batch of distributed processing tools. A language like this strikes me as a step up from those tools in terms of writing readable and expressive data manipulation and a comfortable step down from complicated object notations.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.