IssueRaiser

> Is the problem that the main page doesn't explain things clearly enough?

> Is the problem that the main page doesn't explain things clearly enough? Maybe you'd like to contribute some documentation? No. There are several problems, the first of which is that I am served content as a Javascript-dependent blank page for no good reason. I'm not sure why you think I would contribute to this project. It contradicts my ideals for the future of the web on many levels, as I already explained, and some of which you overlooked when making your comment. Firstly, I do not want to support something that represents a backwards movement from my preference, and secondly, any change I would choose to make would likely be reversed as against the spirit of the project. My belief is that the Benevolent Dictator for Life/cult of personality model of existing open technologies is broken and should be shunned. (With apologies to Ward Cunningham, who I do not mean anything personally towards). People committing their resources to this project are not providing for the diversity that 7 billion web users need. I have plenty of hope. My hope is that other people will take this technology in a better or just different direction.

Posted by learnstats2 on Feb 2, 2015, 2:57 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments

reliability (Other)

> Is the problem that the main page doesn't explain things clearly enough?

learnstats2Feb 2, 2015, 2:57 PM

> Is the problem that the main page doesn't explain things clearly enough? Maybe you'd like to contribute some documentation? No. There are several problems, the first of which is that I am served content as a Javascript-dependent blank page for no good reason. I'm not sure why you think I would contribute to this project. It contradicts my ideals for the future of the web on many levels, as I already explained, and some of which you overlooked when making your comment. Firstly, I do not want to support something that represents a backwards movement from my preference, and secondly, any change I would choose to make would likely be reversed as against the spirit of the project. My belief is that the Benevolent Dictator for Life/cult of personality model of existing open technologies is broken and should be shunned. (With apologies to Ward Cunningham, who I do not mean anything personally towards). People committing their resources to this project are not providing for the diversity that 7 billion web users need. I have plenty of hope. My hope is that other people will take this technology in a better or just different direction.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue