> It runs your tests as you type I write a lot of tests and I've tried this a lot of times (since it can be done with any test framework...
> It runs your tests as you type I write a lot of tests and I've tried this a lot of times (since it can be done with any test framework plus a file watcher on any language) but it doesn't help on my workflow. The integration with the code editor looks nice as long as it has a way to "jump to the first broken test", and show all the details of the error. I remember when I used to work on c# the test runner of resharper integrated and it was great. My current workflow is, I run the tests in the console and if some test is broken, I search the name of the test across the project to inspect. Parallel test execution in javascript hasn't worked for me, most of the time I depend on some "state" call it DOM (browser), or call it a test database (node). The fact that I can assume that the runner run one test at the time makes my tests and the before/after code simpler.
Posted by jfroma on Mar 19, 2015, 12:49 PM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
> It runs your tests as you type I write a lot of tests and I've tried this a lot of times (since it can be done with any test framework...
> It runs your tests as you type I write a lot of tests and I've tried this a lot of times (since it can be done with any test framework plus a file watcher on any language) but it doesn't help on my workflow. The integration with the code editor looks nice as long as it has a way to "jump to the first broken test", and show all the details of the error. I remember when I used to work on c# the test runner of resharper integrated and it was great. My current workflow is, I run the tests in the console and if some test is broken, I search the name of the test across the project to inspect. Parallel test execution in javascript hasn't worked for me, most of the time I depend on some "state" call it DOM (browser), or call it a test database (node). The fact that I can assume that the runner run one test at the time makes my tests and the before/after code simpler.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.