IssueRaiser

No, the difference is that in the west you can access Russia Today ( http://www.rt.com ) and China Daily ( http://www...

No, the difference is that in the west you can access Russia Today ( http://www.rt.com ) and China Daily ( http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/ ), state-owned propaganda channels who delight in publishing anything that would make the U.S. look bad, and in China you can't access the NYT which helped break the Snowden stuff. The Guardian is owned by a trust who have legal obligations based on fair and balanced reporting, and all TV news in the UK - including Murdoch's channels - have a legal obligation to not editorialised, underpinned by a legal system that's been sticking two fingers to vested interests since the Magna Carta. Your sense of perspective is broken.

Posted by peteretep on Mar 31, 2015, 10:03 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments

reliability (Other)

No, the difference is that in the west you can access Russia Today ( http://www.rt.com ) and China Daily ( http://www...

peteretepMar 31, 2015, 10:03 AM

No, the difference is that in the west you can access Russia Today ( http://www.rt.com ) and China Daily ( http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/ ), state-owned propaganda channels who delight in publishing anything that would make the U.S. look bad, and in China you can't access the NYT which helped break the Snowden stuff. The Guardian is owned by a trust who have legal obligations based on fair and balanced reporting, and all TV news in the UK - including Murdoch's channels - have a legal obligation to not editorialised, underpinned by a legal system that's been sticking two fingers to vested interests since the Magna Carta. Your sense of perspective is broken.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue