>That said people trying to distinguish use of any tool to 'fix' an abnormality vs 'enhance' something that is normal are idiots because ...
>That said people trying to distinguish use of any tool to 'fix' an abnormality vs 'enhance' something that is normal are idiots because the distinction is merely one of perspective around whether something is 'broken' or not. man, while i fully support speeding up the evolution through all the means possible, your statement is kind of self-contradictory: you use "normal", and thus implicitly you bring up the notion of some distribution with clear notion of "normal", ie. some well distinguishable significant mass at the center and thus the 'fix'/'enhance' difference becomes very well defined (not just merely one of perspective) - 'fix' is moving up toward the mean/center mass while 'enhance' is moving up toward the mass's upper edge and away from it.
Posted by trhway on May 19, 2015, 12:02 AM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
>That said people trying to distinguish use of any tool to 'fix' an abnormality vs 'enhance' something that is normal are idiots because ...
>That said people trying to distinguish use of any tool to 'fix' an abnormality vs 'enhance' something that is normal are idiots because the distinction is merely one of perspective around whether something is 'broken' or not. man, while i fully support speeding up the evolution through all the means possible, your statement is kind of self-contradictory: you use "normal", and thus implicitly you bring up the notion of some distribution with clear notion of "normal", ie. some well distinguishable significant mass at the center and thus the 'fix'/'enhance' difference becomes very well defined (not just merely one of perspective) - 'fix' is moving up toward the mean/center mass while 'enhance' is moving up toward the mass's upper edge and away from it.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.