The distinction is: If you take a printer, and replace part A, and a time later replace part B, and a time later replace part A again, y...
The distinction is: If you take a printer, and replace part A, and a time later replace part B, and a time later replace part A again, you've thrown out three parts - 2 of A and 1 of B. If you take a printer, and A is broken so you replace the printer, and a time later A is broken again, so you replace the printer again, you've thrown out two entire printers. These are not the same.
Posted by TheLoneWolfling on Feb 8, 2015, 4:33 AM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
The distinction is: If you take a printer, and replace part A, and a time later replace part B, and a time later replace part A again, y...
The distinction is: If you take a printer, and replace part A, and a time later replace part B, and a time later replace part A again, you've thrown out three parts - 2 of A and 1 of B. If you take a printer, and A is broken so you replace the printer, and a time later A is broken again, so you replace the printer again, you've thrown out two entire printers. These are not the same.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.