> think it's because they want to get a glimpse at the process, not just the end result.
> think it's because they want to get a glimpse at the process, not just the end result. I absolutely agree that this is what they are after, but it is a very poor way to extract the information. The interviewer basically hands over his preferred tools and asks you to build something sane out of a pile of vague rules under extreme pressure. Its a close metaphor to real-life where a client (in-house or otherwise) will hand you a pile of vaguely defined rules, someone else gives you a particular toolset and then you go about your job, but it is broken. Remotely performed and turned in code tests (if crafted correctly) are a better assessment of a developers abilities along with code samples of his / her work. But I think all of that should be reserved for people without an established work history. I have excellent references. I have a solid work history. i passed the code test. I have code samples and open source code. Why in the holy fuck am i writing with a marker on a board or worse, answering a riddle?
Posted by robotkilla on Jun 1, 2015, 9:11 PM
Tags
Related issues
- This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
- I wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
- The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
- I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
- I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
- The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,000 issues0 comments
reliability (Other)
This is my biggest problem with agents, they constantly defensively code for cases that have no chance of happening and in most cases a p...
NewI wish there was something like LEAN for biology.
The issue is really the extreme difficulty of programming them, especially for anything sequential (rather than combinatorial).
I probably could have beared with it if it was only limited to programming, but it showing up in creative fields has made me feel all sor...
I hate that I'm in deep enough to know what you mean.
The biggest problem with “AI” is that big corps are shoving it down our throats.
in the middel of a coding session with 5.6 sol.
[Hero Run] 535B-A23B on 18T tokens
> think it's because they want to get a glimpse at the process, not just the end result.
> think it's because they want to get a glimpse at the process, not just the end result. I absolutely agree that this is what they are after, but it is a very poor way to extract the information. The interviewer basically hands over his preferred tools and asks you to build something sane out of a pile of vague rules under extreme pressure. Its a close metaphor to real-life where a client (in-house or otherwise) will hand you a pile of vaguely defined rules, someone else gives you a particular toolset and then you go about your job, but it is broken. Remotely performed and turned in code tests (if crafted correctly) are a better assessment of a developers abilities along with code samples of his / her work. But I think all of that should be reserved for people without an established work history. I have excellent references. I have a solid work history. i passed the code test. I have code samples and open source code. Why in the holy fuck am i writing with a marker on a board or worse, answering a riddle?
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.