IssueRaiser

Well "due process" without the supervision of the populous tends towards the law makers, which have proven at this point unreliable at best.

Well "due process" without the supervision of the populous tends towards the law makers, which have proven at this point unreliable at best. When Government offices can blatantly disregard/subvert/willfully misinterpret the law and perjure themselves in court about that with impunity, it's clear that the existing system is broken. I wouldn't say it's beyond repair, but certainly the legal system needs to be held far more accountable than it is presently - and it's clear that Wikileaks is serving that purpose which is good. However, the manner in which they're doing that isn't beyond reproach.

Posted by balabaster on Apr 17, 2015, 3:56 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,000 issues0 comments

reliability (Other)

Well "due process" without the supervision of the populous tends towards the law makers, which have proven at this point unreliable at best.

balabasterApr 17, 2015, 3:56 PM

Well "due process" without the supervision of the populous tends towards the law makers, which have proven at this point unreliable at best. When Government offices can blatantly disregard/subvert/willfully misinterpret the law and perjure themselves in court about that with impunity, it's clear that the existing system is broken. I wouldn't say it's beyond repair, but certainly the legal system needs to be held far more accountable than it is presently - and it's clear that Wikileaks is serving that purpose which is good. However, the manner in which they're doing that isn't beyond reproach.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue