> The way I read it the intent is to ensure there is one sanctioned version of Rus basically that Through it's very annoying that it ne...
> The way I read it the intent is to ensure there is one sanctioned version of Rus basically that Through it's very annoying that it needs refinement _again_ and _again_ every f* time they update the trademark policy. Like why - is there no exception for research (i.e. science) use, as long as explicitly labeled at such - public development forks which are used to prototype directions rust could go into, again if clearly labeled as such and not maintained as forks (through to be fair the line between a public experimental rust development fork and an early rust "full" fork are thin) - wrt. software compatibility allowance why is it limited to the "packaging system of that platform" can't I fork to idk. create compatibility with a code analysis tool, changes I then later want to upstream but first need to test so need to distribute to various people? and sure you will normally get written permission for all the cases above, just the chance that someone could abuse this preventing you from doing very reasonable thing is IMHO an issue. I really don't want to see a headline like "rust forbids <company> from creating a compatible code analysis tool because <some stupid issue>".
Posted by dathinab on Nov 10, 2024, 8:01 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That's the biggest problem with iOS because Apple can be ordered to block them from the App Store and it would be instantly kill these pr...
- I'm intrigued about the "Trip Planner" being a top-level app.
- This asymmetry is IMO the biggest problem with AI-driven output.
- This is one of the most important objectives in software today.
- At least in Europe - these rouge corporations need to be reined in or just leave the market.
- I was skeptical, but this looks genuinely useful.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (SaaS)
That's the biggest problem with iOS because Apple can be ordered to block them from the App Store and it would be instantly kill these pr...
NewI'm intrigued about the "Trip Planner" being a top-level app.
This asymmetry is IMO the biggest problem with AI-driven output.
This is one of the most important objectives in software today.
At least in Europe - these rouge corporations need to be reined in or just leave the market.
I was skeptical, but this looks genuinely useful.
Why has she gone through so many iPhones?
The biggest problem with Europe is the lack of innovation.
> The way I read it the intent is to ensure there is one sanctioned version of Rus basically that Through it's very annoying that it ne...
> The way I read it the intent is to ensure there is one sanctioned version of Rus basically that Through it's very annoying that it needs refinement _again_ and _again_ every f* time they update the trademark policy. Like why - is there no exception for research (i.e. science) use, as long as explicitly labeled at such - public development forks which are used to prototype directions rust could go into, again if clearly labeled as such and not maintained as forks (through to be fair the line between a public experimental rust development fork and an early rust "full" fork are thin) - wrt. software compatibility allowance why is it limited to the "packaging system of that platform" can't I fork to idk. create compatibility with a code analysis tool, changes I then later want to upstream but first need to test so need to distribute to various people? and sure you will normally get written permission for all the cases above, just the chance that someone could abuse this preventing you from doing very reasonable thing is IMHO an issue. I really don't want to see a headline like "rust forbids <company> from creating a compatible code analysis tool because <some stupid issue>".
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.