IssueRaiser

> It's beautiful in a way that the latter group is way more numerous and uses <1% of the software features, yet gets charged just as much.

> It's beautiful in a way that the latter group is way more numerous and uses <1% of the software features, yet gets charged just as much. Beautiful. And lucrative. I know that I'm in a small&#x2F;medium European company (~400 people total), generally very mindful of how we spend money but this is the exact billing model that would turn us away because too expensive for the features actually used.

Posted by darkwater on Jul 31, 2025, 10:04 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments

pricing (SaaS)

> It's beautiful in a way that the latter group is way more numerous and uses <1% of the software features, yet gets charged just as much.

darkwaterJul 31, 2025, 10:04 AM

> It's beautiful in a way that the latter group is way more numerous and uses <1% of the software features, yet gets charged just as much. Beautiful. And lucrative. I know that I'm in a small&#x2F;medium European company (~400 people total), generally very mindful of how we spend money but this is the exact billing model that would turn us away because too expensive for the features actually used.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue