I don't want to detract from this team or anything, because this looks very pretty and well done.
I don't want to detract from this team or anything, because this looks very pretty and well done. But on the other hand, I have to ask... Do we really need another photo organizer? I'm an amateur photographer, and I take a ton of photos, but I rarely need anything better than Flickr or Dropbox or even a Facebook photo album. What's the selling point for "a better photo organizer"? Is this a pain point that's big enough to justify this kind of time and energy investment? Or is a "photo organizer" app the new to-do app for showing off mobile design skills? Aren't there more pressing problems to solve out there? (Not trying to be snarky, btw. Just kinda thinking out loud. I fully support the developers' ability and right to build whatever they want. I just kinda think this is a first-world problem that has already been solved to death.)
Posted by Jemaclus on May 16, 2014, 6:59 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I hate that this whole cluster of beliefs exists, but software on my own computer enforcing what I can and can't do for ideological reaso...
- As I replied in another comment[1], it's their software, their choice.
- [Feature] Support external model integration via personal API keys and local LLMs (BYOK)
- > So when head of companies don’t care about quality, they’ll push hard no matter what to have speed.
- Feature request: support multiple named accounts per app/connector
- Support standalone Windows installer (`codex-setup.exe`)
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
support (SaaS)
I hate that this whole cluster of beliefs exists, but software on my own computer enforcing what I can and can't do for ideological reaso...
As I replied in another comment[1], it's their software, their choice.
[Feature] Support external model integration via personal API keys and local LLMs (BYOK)
> So when head of companies don’t care about quality, they’ll push hard no matter what to have speed.
Feature request: support multiple named accounts per app/connector
Support standalone Windows installer (`codex-setup.exe`)
[feature]: Move OIDC back to self-hosted OSS(Plane Free)
I was running about 1000 machines on VMware in my previous career.
I don't want to detract from this team or anything, because this looks very pretty and well done.
I don't want to detract from this team or anything, because this looks very pretty and well done. But on the other hand, I have to ask... Do we really need another photo organizer? I'm an amateur photographer, and I take a ton of photos, but I rarely need anything better than Flickr or Dropbox or even a Facebook photo album. What's the selling point for "a better photo organizer"? Is this a pain point that's big enough to justify this kind of time and energy investment? Or is a "photo organizer" app the new to-do app for showing off mobile design skills? Aren't there more pressing problems to solve out there? (Not trying to be snarky, btw. Just kinda thinking out loud. I fully support the developers' ability and right to build whatever they want. I just kinda think this is a first-world problem that has already been solved to death.)
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.