Firefox OS is yet another example of Mozilla apparently thinking that ideological purity alone will somehow entice users into adopting an...
Firefox OS is yet another example of Mozilla apparently thinking that ideological purity alone will somehow entice users into adopting an otherwise average-to-bad software offering. That isn't how reality works, though, obviously. Out of necessity, most users must place software usability and capability above ideology. Software like Firefox OS and Persona will never see serious adoption when they can't compete with long-established and more functional offerings at the most basic levels, even if these competitors may not be as "open". It's an approach that doesn't work for Mozilla's offerings that are already well-established, either. Firefox has been hemorrhaging users ever since its developers stopped focusing on truly improving the user experience, and instead focused solely on copying the worst aspects of Chrome (the UI, for example), while neglecting to address the performance and resource usage problems that have long plagued Firefox. Users need software that works. If that means using software that's "less open" or "closed", they'll do it without a second thought. Mozilla just happens to often be on the losing side of this reality these days. While "openness" can be beneficial, it needs to be in conjunction with software that's at least comparably good to its "closed" competitors. Firefox OS, Persona and Firefox are good examples of where this isn't the case, and how they're either seeing limited to no adoption, or how they're losing existing users.
Posted by Pacabel on Jun 13, 2014, 12:03 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I wish there was a filter in the app store to filter and only show apps that having nothing to do with AI.
- In contrast, Confluence's AI bot is a living nightmare to me.
- Some good points here, and I definitely hate the "unalive" movement but like someone else said, it has gone beyond self-censorship to in-...
- It’s hard to take the article seriously when there’s no real discussion about how consciousness is defined and it takes Anthropic’s views...
- you know what i hate?
- > I honestly do not understand why any average person would buy anything else than a macbook today.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
ux (SaaS)
I wish there was a filter in the app store to filter and only show apps that having nothing to do with AI.
NewIn contrast, Confluence's AI bot is a living nightmare to me.
NewSome good points here, and I definitely hate the "unalive" movement but like someone else said, it has gone beyond self-censorship to in-...
It’s hard to take the article seriously when there’s no real discussion about how consciousness is defined and it takes Anthropic’s views...
you know what i hate?
> I honestly do not understand why any average person would buy anything else than a macbook today.
Codex App frequently freezes/stutters on Windows 11 Pro despite sufficient system resources
Add "Basic" and "Standard" plans
Firefox OS is yet another example of Mozilla apparently thinking that ideological purity alone will somehow entice users into adopting an...
Firefox OS is yet another example of Mozilla apparently thinking that ideological purity alone will somehow entice users into adopting an otherwise average-to-bad software offering. That isn't how reality works, though, obviously. Out of necessity, most users must place software usability and capability above ideology. Software like Firefox OS and Persona will never see serious adoption when they can't compete with long-established and more functional offerings at the most basic levels, even if these competitors may not be as "open". It's an approach that doesn't work for Mozilla's offerings that are already well-established, either. Firefox has been hemorrhaging users ever since its developers stopped focusing on truly improving the user experience, and instead focused solely on copying the worst aspects of Chrome (the UI, for example), while neglecting to address the performance and resource usage problems that have long plagued Firefox. Users need software that works. If that means using software that's "less open" or "closed", they'll do it without a second thought. Mozilla just happens to often be on the losing side of this reality these days. While "openness" can be beneficial, it needs to be in conjunction with software that's at least comparably good to its "closed" competitors. Firefox OS, Persona and Firefox are good examples of where this isn't the case, and how they're either seeing limited to no adoption, or how they're losing existing users.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.