IssueRaiser

I'm tired of these "javascript is dangerous" for rendering sites articles (sorry if this is not one, I can't load it at the moment!) - in...

I'm tired of these "javascript is dangerous" for rendering sites articles (sorry if this is not one, I can't load it at the moment!) - instead there should be one big ass article saying: "javascript is fine for incremental rendering of features, the url should always reflect these increments and hence hard-reloads should be able to pull a fully server side rendered version of the site". END OF STORY.

Posted by dingdingdang on Mar 14, 2015, 12:58 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments

hackernews (Sysadmin)

I'm tired of these "javascript is dangerous" for rendering sites articles (sorry if this is not one, I can't load it at the moment!) - in...

dingdingdangMar 14, 2015, 12:58 PM

I'm tired of these "javascript is dangerous" for rendering sites articles (sorry if this is not one, I can't load it at the moment!) - instead there should be one big ass article saying: "javascript is fine for incremental rendering of features, the url should always reflect these increments and hence hard-reloads should be able to pull a fully server side rendered version of the site". END OF STORY.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue