> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown It’s never like the server becomes lost media when they shut down services. Most development studios have an easy way to run the server stack locally for development anyway. The problem is forcing someone to actually spend several hours doing packaging to get it deployable and the general reluctance of companies to “lose control” of what they have. There are many alternate servers that have existed that developers have intentionally axed like AlterIWNet because of control reasons, not because the complete solution already existed.
Posted by Shank on Oct 18, 2026, 1:14 AM
Tags
Related issues
- "Best build quality" is the most important part.
- Historically that rarely happens because industrial equipment is/was generally too expensive for the average worker to purchase on t...
- I can see why they wanted to change the "RISC-V is inevitable" line.
- The GB10 itself is pretty good and I love using mine for broad Linux development.
- > Nothing stops someone from taking the free Windows Vivado and making it run on Linux The EULA and the fact that the linux versior runs...
- Hetzner has some docs: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/additiona...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Sysadmin)
> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
"Best build quality" is the most important part.
Historically that rarely happens because industrial equipment is/was generally too expensive for the average worker to purchase on t...
I can see why they wanted to change the "RISC-V is inevitable" line.
The GB10 itself is pretty good and I love using mine for broad Linux development.
> Nothing stops someone from taking the free Windows Vivado and making it run on Linux The EULA and the fact that the linux versior runs...
Hetzner has some docs: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/additiona...
> too expensive for our internal server needs; not the right fit for our datacenter partners/customers You and me both.
> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown It’s never like the server becomes lost media when they shut down services. Most development studios have an easy way to run the server stack locally for development anyway. The problem is forcing someone to actually spend several hours doing packaging to get it deployable and the general reluctance of companies to “lose control” of what they have. There are many alternate servers that have existed that developers have intentionally axed like AlterIWNet because of control reasons, not because the complete solution already existed.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.