[ECR] [console multi-arch support]: Support viewing multi-architecture images in the ECR Console UI correctly
<!-- Please keep this note for the community --> ### Community Note * Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 [reaction](https://blog.github.com/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/) to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request * Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request * If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment <!-- Thank you for keeping this note for the community --> <!-- **Security disclosures** If you think you’ve found a potential security issue, please do not post it in the Issues. Instead, please follow the instructions [here](https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting/) or [email AWS security directly](mailto:aws-security@amazon.com). --> **Tell us about your request** Currently, if I were to push a multiple architecture build to ECR, it would show up in the console as multiple images. Let's say I pushed an image that was built for `linux/amd64` and `linux/arm64` and tagged it as "latest", three different images would show up in ECR 1. the digest for linux/amd64 showing as `<untagged>` 2. the digest for linux/arm64 showing as `<untagged>` 3. The digest that points to the manifest that points to the images in 1/2 showing as `latest` This is the correct behavior and pulling and interacting with these images via the `docker` CLI
Posted by bencooper222 on Dec 8, 2021, 10:31 PM
Tags
Related issues
- [Codex Desktop][Windows] Weekly quota jumped 67 points in 38 seconds (Oct 16, 2026; 18:10 UTC)
- I loathe how difficult Matrix is for normal people though.
- Fragile against upgrades, tons of unmaintained plugins, admin panel UX is a mess where you struggle to find the stuff your are looking fo...
- Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be any decent alternative.
- I'm wondering how much of that is bad developer UX and defaults, and how much of that is inherent complexity in the problem space.
- Pulumi support
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,000 issues0 comments
ux (Sysadmin)
[Codex Desktop][Windows] Weekly quota jumped 67 points in 38 seconds (Oct 16, 2026; 18:10 UTC)
I loathe how difficult Matrix is for normal people though.
Fragile against upgrades, tons of unmaintained plugins, admin panel UX is a mess where you struggle to find the stuff your are looking fo...
Unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be any decent alternative.
I'm wondering how much of that is bad developer UX and defaults, and how much of that is inherent complexity in the problem space.
Pulumi support
[Feature]: managing cnpg in GitOps workflows (FluxCD, ArgoCD ...)
Merge the platform and UI threads
[ECR] [console multi-arch support]: Support viewing multi-architecture images in the ECR Console UI correctly
<!-- Please keep this note for the community --> ### Community Note * Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 [reaction](https://blog.github.com/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/) to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request * Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request * If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment <!-- Thank you for keeping this note for the community --> <!-- **Security disclosures** If you think you’ve found a potential security issue, please do not post it in the Issues. Instead, please follow the instructions [here](https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting/) or [email AWS security directly](mailto:aws-security@amazon.com). --> **Tell us about your request** Currently, if I were to push a multiple architecture build to ECR, it would show up in the console as multiple images. Let's say I pushed an image that was built for `linux/amd64` and `linux/arm64` and tagged it as "latest", three different images would show up in ECR 1. the digest for linux/amd64 showing as `<untagged>` 2. the digest for linux/arm64 showing as `<untagged>` 3. The digest that points to the manifest that points to the images in 1/2 showing as `latest` This is the correct behavior and pulling and interacting with these images via the `docker` CLI
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.