To take a slightly different example, when I lived in Canada I was a member of a group trying to remove barriers to FLOSS in the Canadian...
To take a slightly different example, when I lived in Canada I was a member of a group trying to remove barriers to FLOSS in the Canadian government. One of the things we often talked about was our concern that people with purchasing authority in IT sometimes took early retirement from the government as soon as they could get full pension. They would then take up various positions in Microsoft in their retirement. The concern was that there was an implicit agreement that if the people with purchasing authority made sure that Microsoft products were pushed through, they would be able to retire early, draw their pension and also receive a salary from MS. Indeed, Corel once won a lawsuit showing that the Canadian government was making RFPs which specified that the software had to come from MS (which is against Canadian government policy). Of course it makes considerable sense for companies to hire retired government insiders to help them with strategy and/or lobbying. There is no way to prove that there was any wrong doing while the person was a government employee. There are also no conflict of interest guidelines that can apply since the person is no longer a government employee. It does, however, raise the question about whether or not the appointment is actually the payment on a bribe for services rendered. While such an allegation requires proof, it is important to stay alert to these kinds of things.
Posted by mikekchar on Jul 28, 2015, 1:10 AM
Tags
Related issues
- Congrats on the move to Google!
- The federal government hasn't even lifted a finger to control undergrad education costs.
- Nice to see someone addressing this annoying problem, I'm seeing first hand bot traffic go up as they are just gobbling up data.
- Why is there no standardized e-ID in the US?
- There's an unmet need in social networks for "identity verified and protected", wherein the social network proves to a reasonable^ degree...
- The reason to create a new category is because the current categories don't solve the problem for a specific target audience.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (FinTech)
Congrats on the move to Google!
The federal government hasn't even lifted a finger to control undergrad education costs.
Nice to see someone addressing this annoying problem, I'm seeing first hand bot traffic go up as they are just gobbling up data.
Why is there no standardized e-ID in the US?
There's an unmet need in social networks for "identity verified and protected", wherein the social network proves to a reasonable^ degree...
The reason to create a new category is because the current categories don't solve the problem for a specific target audience.
Unfortunately in the enterprise, the purchasing decision maker is usually not the user, and may not even use the invoice screen before de...
To take a slightly different example, when I lived in Canada I was a member of a group trying to remove barriers to FLOSS in the Canadian...
To take a slightly different example, when I lived in Canada I was a member of a group trying to remove barriers to FLOSS in the Canadian...
To take a slightly different example, when I lived in Canada I was a member of a group trying to remove barriers to FLOSS in the Canadian government. One of the things we often talked about was our concern that people with purchasing authority in IT sometimes took early retirement from the government as soon as they could get full pension. They would then take up various positions in Microsoft in their retirement. The concern was that there was an implicit agreement that if the people with purchasing authority made sure that Microsoft products were pushed through, they would be able to retire early, draw their pension and also receive a salary from MS. Indeed, Corel once won a lawsuit showing that the Canadian government was making RFPs which specified that the software had to come from MS (which is against Canadian government policy). Of course it makes considerable sense for companies to hire retired government insiders to help them with strategy and/or lobbying. There is no way to prove that there was any wrong doing while the person was a government employee. There are also no conflict of interest guidelines that can apply since the person is no longer a government employee. It does, however, raise the question about whether or not the appointment is actually the payment on a bribe for services rendered. While such an allegation requires proof, it is important to stay alert to these kinds of things.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.