Let’s Define CSS 4
It’s come up quite a few times recently that the world of people who make websites would greatly benefit from the CSS Working Group officially defining ”CSS 4”, and later “CSS 5“, etc. Chris Coyier [wrote](https://css-tricks.com/css4/): >CSS3, and perhaps to a larger degree, "HTML5", became (almost) household names. It was so successful, it's leaving us wanting to pull that lever again. It was successful on a ton of levels: >• It pushed browser technology forward, particularly on technologies that had been stale for too long. >• It got site owners to think, "hey maybe it's a good time to update our website." >• It got educators to think, "hey maybe it's a good time to update our curriculums." >• It was good for the web overall, good for websites taking advantage of it Nicole Sullivan [wrote](https://twitter.com/stubbornella/status/1083768515524349952): >Unpopular opinion: CSS and HTML need to increment their version numbers again so we can convince business to invest in these technologies. 😂 [and](https://twitter.com/stubbornella/status/1226949796667088896) >Marketing isn't a dirty word, really! In fact I advocated incrementing version numbers *for that very reason* PPK [wrote](https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2020/01/css4_is_here.html): > I think that CSS would be greatly helped if we solemnly state that “CSS4 is here!” In this post I’ll try to convince you of my viewpoint. > >I am proposing that we web developers, supported by the W3C CSS WG, start saying “CSS
Posted by jensimmons on Feb 12, 2020, 4:56 PM
Tags
Related issues
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,500 issues0 comments
github (Marketing)
Proposal: Set `debugShowCheckedModeBanner` Default to false
Angular Layout Migration Guides
sitemap.xml
Let’s Define CSS 4
Improve the indexability (SEO) of Flutter apps on the web
Let’s Define CSS 4
It’s come up quite a few times recently that the world of people who make websites would greatly benefit from the CSS Working Group officially defining ”CSS 4”, and later “CSS 5“, etc. Chris Coyier [wrote](https://css-tricks.com/css4/): >CSS3, and perhaps to a larger degree, "HTML5", became (almost) household names. It was so successful, it's leaving us wanting to pull that lever again. It was successful on a ton of levels: >• It pushed browser technology forward, particularly on technologies that had been stale for too long. >• It got site owners to think, "hey maybe it's a good time to update our website." >• It got educators to think, "hey maybe it's a good time to update our curriculums." >• It was good for the web overall, good for websites taking advantage of it Nicole Sullivan [wrote](https://twitter.com/stubbornella/status/1083768515524349952): >Unpopular opinion: CSS and HTML need to increment their version numbers again so we can convince business to invest in these technologies. 😂 [and](https://twitter.com/stubbornella/status/1226949796667088896) >Marketing isn't a dirty word, really! In fact I advocated incrementing version numbers *for that very reason* PPK [wrote](https://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2020/01/css4_is_here.html): > I think that CSS would be greatly helped if we solemnly state that “CSS4 is here!” In this post I’ll try to convince you of my viewpoint. > >I am proposing that we web developers, supported by the W3C CSS WG, start saying “CSS
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.