IssueRaiser

> A radical idea: Maybe our model of intellectual property is wrong, or outdated.

> A radical idea: Maybe our model of intellectual property is wrong, or outdated. Honestly, that's not really radical. It seems to be pretty clear to anyone who knows anything about computers. There may be flaws your other thoughts, as other commenters have suggested, but not with the first one. The big problem -- in the U.S. anyway -- is that there are huge companies with a vested interest in maintaining something like the late-ish 20th century copyright regime. These make campaign contributions to lawmakers, who pass laws in their favor, which allow them to continue making money, which they contribute to lawmakers, etc. It appears to me that little is going to change until that cycle is broken.

Posted by ggchappell on Jul 8, 2015, 11:02 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,500 issues0 comments

reliability (Marketing)

> A radical idea: Maybe our model of intellectual property is wrong, or outdated.

ggchappellJul 8, 2015, 11:02 PM

> A radical idea: Maybe our model of intellectual property is wrong, or outdated. Honestly, that's not really radical. It seems to be pretty clear to anyone who knows anything about computers. There may be flaws your other thoughts, as other commenters have suggested, but not with the first one. The big problem -- in the U.S. anyway -- is that there are huge companies with a vested interest in maintaining something like the late-ish 20th century copyright regime. These make campaign contributions to lawmakers, who pass laws in their favor, which allow them to continue making money, which they contribute to lawmakers, etc. It appears to me that little is going to change until that cycle is broken.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue