IssueRaiser

I hate this type of argument because it completely circumvent the point.

I hate this type of argument because it completely circumvent the point. The point isn't that if you're rich that means you've stolen something from the poor. It's the belief that the way our civil society is organized is broken, and plenty of riots have occurred for that reason in the past. The idea is that increased concentrations of wealth to an increasingly smaller percentage of people leads to a less innovative and content populace. And that we should be trying to avoid those trends, it's says something about what and who we value as a society. So stop bringing up the strawman of "rich people are evil" when the article wasn't even trying to making that point. Can we have a discussion about income inequality without that bogus line of thinking?

Posted by efuquen on Mar 31, 2015, 2:57 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments

reliability (Marketing)

I hate this type of argument because it completely circumvent the point.

efuquenMar 31, 2015, 2:57 PM

I hate this type of argument because it completely circumvent the point. The point isn't that if you're rich that means you've stolen something from the poor. It's the belief that the way our civil society is organized is broken, and plenty of riots have occurred for that reason in the past. The idea is that increased concentrations of wealth to an increasingly smaller percentage of people leads to a less innovative and content populace. And that we should be trying to avoid those trends, it's says something about what and who we value as a society. So stop bringing up the strawman of "rich people are evil" when the article wasn't even trying to making that point. Can we have a discussion about income inequality without that bogus line of thinking?

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue