There is some genuine concern about any regulations involving the internet.
There is some genuine concern about any regulations involving the internet. But the need for Net Belligerence only arises in stifled and monopolized markets. The solution would be to break open the myriad of rules that make it hard for independent ISPs to expand: from local right-of-way's to utility poles to telecom regulations. When bandwidth is expanding in a Moore's law manner, Net Neutrality begins to be less relevant. ISPs under market forces will expand their network capacity to meet demand. It's monopoly ISPs that want to forego that investment to squeeze out content distributors. In the end, even if Net Neutrality is passed, that still leaves entrenched monopoly ISPs with outdated networks (and terrible customer support). Even if the big ISPs get broken up and get forced to inter-connect, there remains the problem of local regulations, right-of-way's and utility poles (local utilities are also monopolies under political control).
Posted by iwwr on Jun 8, 2014, 9:40 AM
Tags
Related issues
- I can't recall who said it, but "The biggest problem with golden ages is that you never realize you're in one until it's over".
- [BUG] No response from API error when Advisor is triggered
- I thought the general premise is that humans can't form social groups bigger than around ~200.
- great, now can we convince the rest of the internet to start adding AAAA records and ipv6 endpoints for things.
- > It's only with the emergence of whiny, persnickety Unix devs who refused to leave the comforting embrace of their editor of choice that...
- Contrary to some other comments: no, IPV6 hasn't taken over the world at all.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,500 issues0 comments
reliability (Network)
I can't recall who said it, but "The biggest problem with golden ages is that you never realize you're in one until it's over".
[BUG] No response from API error when Advisor is triggered
I thought the general premise is that humans can't form social groups bigger than around ~200.
great, now can we convince the rest of the internet to start adding AAAA records and ipv6 endpoints for things.
> It's only with the emergence of whiny, persnickety Unix devs who refused to leave the comforting embrace of their editor of choice that...
Contrary to some other comments: no, IPV6 hasn't taken over the world at all.
Copy and paste not working
Full Offline Support
There is some genuine concern about any regulations involving the internet.
There is some genuine concern about any regulations involving the internet. But the need for Net Belligerence only arises in stifled and monopolized markets. The solution would be to break open the myriad of rules that make it hard for independent ISPs to expand: from local right-of-way's to utility poles to telecom regulations. When bandwidth is expanding in a Moore's law manner, Net Neutrality begins to be less relevant. ISPs under market forces will expand their network capacity to meet demand. It's monopoly ISPs that want to forego that investment to squeeze out content distributors. In the end, even if Net Neutrality is passed, that still leaves entrenched monopoly ISPs with outdated networks (and terrible customer support). Even if the big ISPs get broken up and get forced to inter-connect, there remains the problem of local regulations, right-of-way's and utility poles (local utilities are also monopolies under political control).
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.