internal/poll: transparently support new linux io_uring interface
A document on the latest linux IO syscall has made the rounds of discussion forums on the internet: http://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdf I wanted to open a discussion on whether we could (and should) add transparent support for this on supported linux kernels. LWN article: https://lwn.net/Articles/776703/
Posted by johanbrandhorst on May 8, 2019, 11:05 AM
Tags
Related issues
- That Reddit post is feeding more conspiracy thinking than helping.
- Support BYOK/Custom Models for Inline Code Completions
- DNS-PERSIST-01 challenge support (planned for late Q1 2026)
- Yeah I can't really blame people for not realising they have shitty mics and shitty internet because it's really hard for them to tell!
- Onboarding guide for FluentAssertions
- Add WebTransport support
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.4,000 issues0 comments
support (Network)
That Reddit post is feeding more conspiracy thinking than helping.
Support BYOK/Custom Models for Inline Code Completions
DNS-PERSIST-01 challenge support (planned for late Q1 2026)
Yeah I can't really blame people for not realising they have shitty mics and shitty internet because it's really hard for them to tell!
Onboarding guide for FluentAssertions
Add WebTransport support
> solar electricity is already cheaper than natural gas Does that include transmission?
Support for WireGuard only peers
internal/poll: transparently support new linux io_uring interface
A document on the latest linux IO syscall has made the rounds of discussion forums on the internet: http://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdf I wanted to open a discussion on whether we could (and should) add transparent support for this on supported linux kernels. LWN article: https://lwn.net/Articles/776703/
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.