WOOT is the highest profile conference on "offensive security"†.
WOOT is the highest profile conference on "offensive security"†. The point of publishing in WOOT is the same as publishing in any other academic conference. WOOT has published, just in the past few years, Dawn Song, Matthew Green, Dan Boneh, Niels Provos, Thorsten Holz, Zakir Durumeric, Solar Designer, Joe Grand, Sergey Bratus, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann, Dionysus Blazakis, Julien Vanegue, Rolf Rolles, Collin Mulliner, Stefan Savage, Travis Goodspeed, Stephen Checkoway, and Felix Lindner. Those are just the names I personally recognize; they've published many, many more than that. Unlike in theoretical CS, a lot of work in WOOT's domain is done in the industry. So WOOT makes an effort to solicit contributions from the industry. Does that make more sense? † I hate that term, but look at the topics in the CFP to see what it means
Posted by tptacek on Mar 23, 2015, 9:25 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
- That usually works well enough for risc code.
- > The Bulletin calls her Miss Swindell.
- I wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech ...
- Android work profiles allow you to run multiple isolated copies in parallel - with separate address book and all.
- The other day I saw the last episodes of The Office again.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
complaint (Other)
I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
NewThat usually works well enough for risc code.
New> The Bulletin calls her Miss Swindell.
NewI wish there was a way to sort by recency, if i'm mainly interested in finding obscure gems from like last 6 to 12 months of ai and tech ...
NewAndroid work profiles allow you to run multiple isolated copies in parallel - with separate address book and all.
NewThe other day I saw the last episodes of The Office again.
> someone has made the wrong editor choice Just the other day I made this comment on the topic of "nvim vs emacs", I think it fits here ...
GLES isn't a bad way to teach graphics but I wish there was a middle ground between it and VK.
WOOT is the highest profile conference on "offensive security"†.
WOOT is the highest profile conference on "offensive security"†. The point of publishing in WOOT is the same as publishing in any other academic conference. WOOT has published, just in the past few years, Dawn Song, Matthew Green, Dan Boneh, Niels Provos, Thorsten Holz, Zakir Durumeric, Solar Designer, Joe Grand, Sergey Bratus, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann, Dionysus Blazakis, Julien Vanegue, Rolf Rolles, Collin Mulliner, Stefan Savage, Travis Goodspeed, Stephen Checkoway, and Felix Lindner. Those are just the names I personally recognize; they've published many, many more than that. Unlike in theoretical CS, a lot of work in WOOT's domain is done in the industry. So WOOT makes an effort to solicit contributions from the industry. Does that make more sense? † I hate that term, but look at the topics in the CFP to see what it means
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.