Yes, "cyberweapons" (I hate that term but know why people use it) are much harder to control than bioweapons.
Yes, "cyberweapons" (I hate that term but know why people use it) are much harder to control than bioweapons. How would you control them? What would that policy look like? Want to take a stab at one? I'm interested in what people think should be done about this problem.
Posted by tptacek on Nov 13, 2014, 3:13 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Unless it is running on a government issued iPhone, it is not the Individual #1 you are alluding to.
- Great job, will try it.
- I also have a 2014 CR-V and I hate this too.
- I wish there was a setting to make audio and video opt in per site.
- There sure are.
- I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
complaint (Other)
Unless it is running on a government issued iPhone, it is not the Individual #1 you are alluding to.
NewGreat job, will try it.
NewI also have a 2014 CR-V and I hate this too.
NewI wish there was a setting to make audio and video opt in per site.
There sure are.
I feel like it's once a week that HN surfaces some incredibly overhyped, low-on-the-hierarchy-of-evidence ( https://en.wikipedi...
That usually works well enough for risc code.
> The Bulletin calls her Miss Swindell.
Yes, "cyberweapons" (I hate that term but know why people use it) are much harder to control than bioweapons.
Yes, "cyberweapons" (I hate that term but know why people use it) are much harder to control than bioweapons. How would you control them? What would that policy look like? Want to take a stab at one? I'm interested in what people think should be done about this problem.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.