IssueRaiser

Going by the system card at: https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-system-card/ > GPT‑5 is a unified system .

Going by the system card at: https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-system-card/ > GPT‑5 is a unified system . . . OK > . . . with a smart and fast model that answers most questions, a deeper reasoning model for harder problems, and a real-time router that quickly decides which model to use based on conversation type, complexity, tool needs, and explicit intent (for example, if you say “think hard about this” in the prompt). So that's not really a unified system then, it's just supposed to appear as if it is. This looks like they're not training the single big model but instead have gone off to develop special sub models and attempt to gloss over them with yet another model. That's what you resort to only when doing the end-to-end training has become too expensive for you.

Posted by fidotron on Aug 7, 2025, 5:49 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments

pricing (Other)

Going by the system card at: https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-system-card/ > GPT‑5 is a unified system .

fidotronAug 7, 2025, 5:49 PM

Going by the system card at: https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-system-card/ > GPT‑5 is a unified system . . . OK > . . . with a smart and fast model that answers most questions, a deeper reasoning model for harder problems, and a real-time router that quickly decides which model to use based on conversation type, complexity, tool needs, and explicit intent (for example, if you say “think hard about this” in the prompt). So that's not really a unified system then, it's just supposed to appear as if it is. This looks like they're not training the single big model but instead have gone off to develop special sub models and attempt to gloss over them with yet another model. That's what you resort to only when doing the end-to-end training has become too expensive for you.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue