IssueRaiser

Per abstract it's a "a dynamic difference-in-differences" analysis, which means likely that they see whether the employee behavior change...

Per abstract it's a "a dynamic difference-in-differences" analysis, which means likely that they see whether the employee behavior changes after the event. But establishing causation with it still requires quite a few assumptions. PNAS is kinda known for headline grabbing research with at times a bit less rigorous methodology. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2017/10/04/breaking-p... > Certainly they took the time to perform a controlled experiment and assigned managers at random to deliver the birthday cards late or on time. That would be cheap to do and minimally invasive for the human subjects. If the results are true, it would be actually quite expensive because of the drop in productivity. It could also be a bit of a nightmare to push through ethical review.

Posted by jampekka on Jan 24, 2026, 3:39 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments

pricing (Other)

Per abstract it's a "a dynamic difference-in-differences" analysis, which means likely that they see whether the employee behavior change...

jampekkaJan 24, 2026, 3:39 PM

Per abstract it's a "a dynamic difference-in-differences" analysis, which means likely that they see whether the employee behavior changes after the event. But establishing causation with it still requires quite a few assumptions. PNAS is kinda known for headline grabbing research with at times a bit less rigorous methodology. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2017/10/04/breaking-p... > Certainly they took the time to perform a controlled experiment and assigned managers at random to deliver the birthday cards late or on time. That would be cheap to do and minimally invasive for the human subjects. If the results are true, it would be actually quite expensive because of the drop in productivity. It could also be a bit of a nightmare to push through ethical review.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue