Whatever the cost in C, Haskell is incurring the same cost, unless it is using green threads.
Whatever the cost in C, Haskell is incurring the same cost, unless it is using green threads. (You could use green threads in C - or something similar, though to be honest counting words in a file is a bit of an annoying problem for parallelism)
Posted by raverbashing on Oct 16, 2019, 8:13 AM
Tags
Related issues
- Everything is too expensive for European bureaucrats.
- Yeah, the plan is far too expensive for what it provides.
- Crashed demand after one of the big AI labs (probably Anthropic because they focus way too hard on expensive frontier models) become inso...
- /dev/random is much too expensive for this.
- Yeah, this always bugged me.
- A year ago, I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,500 issues0 comments
pricing (Other)
Everything is too expensive for European bureaucrats.
NewYeah, the plan is far too expensive for what it provides.
NewCrashed demand after one of the big AI labs (probably Anthropic because they focus way too hard on expensive frontier models) become inso...
New/dev/random is much too expensive for this.
Yeah, this always bugged me.
A year ago, I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after...
The weird thing about this product is that its biggest competitor is "an old ipad." I feel like most of their target customer base alread...
There's a talk from Travis Kalanick recently on a podcast about this.
Whatever the cost in C, Haskell is incurring the same cost, unless it is using green threads.
Whatever the cost in C, Haskell is incurring the same cost, unless it is using green threads. (You could use green threads in C - or something similar, though to be honest counting words in a file is a bit of an annoying problem for parallelism)
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.