Request: Class Decorator Mutation
If we can get this to type check properly, we would have perfect support for boilerplate-free mixins: ``` typescript declare function Blah<T>(target: T): T & {foo: number} @Blah class Foo { bar() { return this.foo; // Property 'foo' does not exist on type 'Foo' } } new Foo().foo; // Property 'foo' does not exist on type 'Foo' ```
Posted by Gaelan on Sep 20, 2015, 6:05 AM
Tags
Related issues
- some bike vendor told me that the biggest problem with regular to ebike conversion was that regular bike frames were not strong enough to...
- I think of this as the kiosk economy.
- What a goofy comment.
- There's lots of evidence for positive influences of Caffeine on the body (some negative as well), especially the brain.
- Compose support in WSLc
- [RFC] Roadmap to v2.0
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
support (Other)
some bike vendor told me that the biggest problem with regular to ebike conversion was that regular bike frames were not strong enough to...
I think of this as the kiosk economy.
What a goofy comment.
There's lots of evidence for positive influences of Caffeine on the body (some negative as well), especially the brain.
Compose support in WSLc
[RFC] Roadmap to v2.0
[Feature]: Add TurboQuant Support for KV Cache Quantization
Support for AGENTS.md and .agents/skills/, the community has been asking since August 2025
Request: Class Decorator Mutation
If we can get this to type check properly, we would have perfect support for boilerplate-free mixins: ``` typescript declare function Blah<T>(target: T): T & {foo: number} @Blah class Foo { bar() { return this.foo; // Property 'foo' does not exist on type 'Foo' } } new Foo().foo; // Property 'foo' does not exist on type 'Foo' ```
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.