What I doubt is not relevant.
What I doubt is not relevant. You claimed that the speech had " ... very little in solid critiques, but instead weighs to emotions", but provided no support for this statement at all. That is, after all, precisely what unsubstantiated means. Which is why I commented at all, being tired of commentary that simultaneously complains about either the low quality of current comments, or the impossibility of high quality comments --- while at the same time providing negative value itself. Your approach is a variant of the tired formula "The post is [stupid/terrible/useless/...]. I am obviously [more knowledgeable/smarter than you/right/...]. Anyone who would disagree is clearly [an idiot/partisan/lazy/...], and I fully expect to see them come out in droves now". This risible style does far more to lower the tone than any linked article I've ever seen here.
Posted by ska on Feb 27, 2015, 8:16 PM
Tags
Related issues
- some bike vendor told me that the biggest problem with regular to ebike conversion was that regular bike frames were not strong enough to...
- I think of this as the kiosk economy.
- What a goofy comment.
- There's lots of evidence for positive influences of Caffeine on the body (some negative as well), especially the brain.
- Compose support in WSLc
- [RFC] Roadmap to v2.0
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
support (Other)
some bike vendor told me that the biggest problem with regular to ebike conversion was that regular bike frames were not strong enough to...
I think of this as the kiosk economy.
What a goofy comment.
There's lots of evidence for positive influences of Caffeine on the body (some negative as well), especially the brain.
Compose support in WSLc
[RFC] Roadmap to v2.0
[Feature]: Add TurboQuant Support for KV Cache Quantization
Support for AGENTS.md and .agents/skills/, the community has been asking since August 2025
What I doubt is not relevant.
What I doubt is not relevant. You claimed that the speech had " ... very little in solid critiques, but instead weighs to emotions", but provided no support for this statement at all. That is, after all, precisely what unsubstantiated means. Which is why I commented at all, being tired of commentary that simultaneously complains about either the low quality of current comments, or the impossibility of high quality comments --- while at the same time providing negative value itself. Your approach is a variant of the tired formula "The post is [stupid/terrible/useless/...]. I am obviously [more knowledgeable/smarter than you/right/...]. Anyone who would disagree is clearly [an idiot/partisan/lazy/...], and I fully expect to see them come out in droves now". This risible style does far more to lower the tone than any linked article I've ever seen here.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.