IssueRaiser

> Do we really need to care about these people?

> Do we really need to care about these people? Yes, because it's most people . It's most of your addressable market, whatever you're selling. It's also their siblings and parents and spouses. Some of mine, too. Possibly even yours. > it's very hard to write a fully informative, fully accurate headline (...) I have no doubt that the news media experience the same problem. There's no good solution for willful ignorance. This is a problem too, but it's not the problem. The problem is that a lot of the news headlines intentionally lie . The pattern is, put a purposefully misleading statement in the headline, then correct it in the article. The lie works as clickbait, but it's not its only effect: everyone in publishing knows most people don't read past headline - that's simply because they'll see 10 or 100 headlines for any single article they can afford to read. Even the non-willfully ignorant will be exposed to 99 simplistic lies for each nuanced opinion. > I really have zero sympathy for how non-readers of articles ignorantly misinterpret headlines. You can't idiot-proof the news. For any article, those "non-readers" are by far the vast majority of people exposed to it. You can't really prevent it, as it's a function of the amount of news. But you also shouldn't exploit it to sell people lies and propaganda.

Posted by TeMPOraL on Nov 27, 2024, 5:21 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments

ux (Other)

> Do we really need to care about these people?

TeMPOraLNov 27, 2024, 5:21 PM

> Do we really need to care about these people? Yes, because it's most people . It's most of your addressable market, whatever you're selling. It's also their siblings and parents and spouses. Some of mine, too. Possibly even yours. > it's very hard to write a fully informative, fully accurate headline (...) I have no doubt that the news media experience the same problem. There's no good solution for willful ignorance. This is a problem too, but it's not the problem. The problem is that a lot of the news headlines intentionally lie . The pattern is, put a purposefully misleading statement in the headline, then correct it in the article. The lie works as clickbait, but it's not its only effect: everyone in publishing knows most people don't read past headline - that's simply because they'll see 10 or 100 headlines for any single article they can afford to read. Even the non-willfully ignorant will be exposed to 99 simplistic lies for each nuanced opinion. > I really have zero sympathy for how non-readers of articles ignorantly misinterpret headlines. You can't idiot-proof the news. For any article, those "non-readers" are by far the vast majority of people exposed to it. You can't really prevent it, as it's a function of the amount of news. But you also shouldn't exploit it to sell people lies and propaganda.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue