IssueRaiser

My point is just that there are huge number of biological corner cases that are skipped.

My point is just that there are huge number of biological corner cases that are skipped. It was just another example. > and I think that a you-don't-need-to-know approach to teaching science is part of the problem I agree actually, yet it's really hard to do for biology since it's not so much a science with axioms as archeology where you just look and see what there is. So there's no way to actually say one way or another "this is all the types". Maybe no animal like that has been found. Or maybe it could be done with another type, but no such animals exist - so do you say there is another type or not?

Posted by ars on May 5, 2015, 5:04 AM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments

ux (Other)

My point is just that there are huge number of biological corner cases that are skipped.

arsMay 5, 2015, 5:04 AM

My point is just that there are huge number of biological corner cases that are skipped. It was just another example. > and I think that a you-don't-need-to-know approach to teaching science is part of the problem I agree actually, yet it's really hard to do for biology since it's not so much a science with axioms as archeology where you just look and see what there is. So there's no way to actually say one way or another "this is all the types". Maybe no animal like that has been found. Or maybe it could be done with another type, but no such animals exist - so do you say there is another type or not?

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue