That's because we don't actually have any concrete evidence one way or the other.
That's because we don't actually have any concrete evidence one way or the other. This is the biggest problem with the whole static/dynamic debate. Until there are studies that clearly demonstrate that projects written in statically typed languages have statistically less defects, are developed faster, or are easier to maintain, it's all anecdotal evidence. There are tons of large real world projects developed in both static and dynamic languages, there's very little indication that projects developed in dynamic languages have significantly more defects or that they're more difficult to maintain. In fact, some of the largest and most robust applications are written in Erlang. See the paper from Joe Armstrong as an example ( https://www.sics.se/~joe/thesis/armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf ).
Posted by yogthos on Oct 7, 2014, 11:58 PM
Tags
Related issues
- To be fair, Inform7 can't succeed, generally, because there is no market for the kind of games that you create with Inform7.
- > The notion that somehow LR reliability is misunderstood by Consumer Reports, JD Power, Car & Driver, Automobile etc.
- Custom trigger IDs are not displayed in the new 2026.10 trigger selector
- I hate that too, but I think it’s more the ux than the concept of a default.
- > The biggest problem with UX developers is they know better than you AND force you into their paradigm.
- "Focus follows mouse" is what I use to keep the file manager from popping up when click-dragging files.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.9,000 issues0 comments
ux (Other)
To be fair, Inform7 can't succeed, generally, because there is no market for the kind of games that you create with Inform7.
> The notion that somehow LR reliability is misunderstood by Consumer Reports, JD Power, Car & Driver, Automobile etc.
Custom trigger IDs are not displayed in the new 2026.10 trigger selector
I hate that too, but I think it’s more the ux than the concept of a default.
> The biggest problem with UX developers is they know better than you AND force you into their paradigm.
"Focus follows mouse" is what I use to keep the file manager from popping up when click-dragging files.
The biggest problem with this is if the target URL doesn't load but also doesn't quickly error out, like e.g.
Google wants to build up a private web here.
That's because we don't actually have any concrete evidence one way or the other.
That's because we don't actually have any concrete evidence one way or the other. This is the biggest problem with the whole static/dynamic debate. Until there are studies that clearly demonstrate that projects written in statically typed languages have statistically less defects, are developed faster, or are easier to maintain, it's all anecdotal evidence. There are tons of large real world projects developed in both static and dynamic languages, there's very little indication that projects developed in dynamic languages have significantly more defects or that they're more difficult to maintain. In fact, some of the largest and most robust applications are written in Erlang. See the paper from Joe Armstrong as an example ( https://www.sics.se/~joe/thesis/armstrong_thesis_2003.pdf ).
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.