IssueRaiser

Trying to shoehorn a performance hungry HTML5 OS on low-end phones was a complete waste of time.

Trying to shoehorn a performance hungry HTML5 OS on low-end phones was a complete waste of time. Just read this review of the $35 Firefox phone [1]: it's completely unusable to the point that even typing is difficult. What an embarrassment. I bought the mid-spec Flame developer device out of curiosity, and it's not much better. Everything feels slow, sluggish and unresponsive. Even Android 2.x was better. My quad-core i7 desktop still occasionally struggles to render the latest and greatest HTML5 stuff at 60 fps. How on earth do they expect a phone to do the same? [1] http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/10/testing-a-35-firefox-...

Posted by veeti on May 25, 2015, 7:04 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments

ux (Other)

Trying to shoehorn a performance hungry HTML5 OS on low-end phones was a complete waste of time.

veetiMay 25, 2015, 7:04 PM

Trying to shoehorn a performance hungry HTML5 OS on low-end phones was a complete waste of time. Just read this review of the $35 Firefox phone [1]: it's completely unusable to the point that even typing is difficult. What an embarrassment. I bought the mid-spec Flame developer device out of curiosity, and it's not much better. Everything feels slow, sluggish and unresponsive. Even Android 2.x was better. My quad-core i7 desktop still occasionally struggles to render the latest and greatest HTML5 stuff at 60 fps. How on earth do they expect a phone to do the same? [1] http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/10/testing-a-35-firefox-...

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue