Facebook instant articles is maybe great for users, but it's sad for the web.
Facebook instant articles is maybe great for users, but it's sad for the web. It will load articles much faster, but will create a more fragmented kind of web. But then again the web of the future may not be just a few general purpose web browsers? Maybe we'll see an even larger myriad of special purpose "browsers" for various types of content like news articles. Many apps are like small special purpose browsers made to display data from just one site. The problem is that users have to have the app permanently using storage space on the phone. I wish there was mobile browsers that managed to store the javascript and static assets more permanently than browsers do now, but not too permanent.
Posted by thomasfl on May 14, 2015, 2:21 PM
Tags
Related issues
- I left Gnome 3 for Mate early on and I never looked back, but here are the issues I remember.
- Yay, I found my people… I switch between Android and iPhone every few cycles, and I really do miss my swipe keyboard on Android.
- > LLMs to me are just another tool.
- I used to be one of those people that would countdown the hours to Apple's launch events and tune in for the live stream.
- > "Over the years it has been clear that we in the “open source” camp (as opposed to the “free software” camp) were wrong all along.
- > So you trusted 22-year-old coffee junkies copying and pasting from stack overflow 10 years ago Absolutely yes...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,500 issues0 comments
complaint (SaaS)
I left Gnome 3 for Mate early on and I never looked back, but here are the issues I remember.
Yay, I found my people… I switch between Android and iPhone every few cycles, and I really do miss my swipe keyboard on Android.
> LLMs to me are just another tool.
I used to be one of those people that would countdown the hours to Apple's launch events and tune in for the live stream.
> "Over the years it has been clear that we in the “open source” camp (as opposed to the “free software” camp) were wrong all along.
> So you trusted 22-year-old coffee junkies copying and pasting from stack overflow 10 years ago Absolutely yes...
I don't want to Godwin this thread so early, but you know what analogy I'm thinking of.
Some people don’t use AI and I don’t get it.
Facebook instant articles is maybe great for users, but it's sad for the web.
Facebook instant articles is maybe great for users, but it's sad for the web. It will load articles much faster, but will create a more fragmented kind of web. But then again the web of the future may not be just a few general purpose web browsers? Maybe we'll see an even larger myriad of special purpose "browsers" for various types of content like news articles. Many apps are like small special purpose browsers made to display data from just one site. The problem is that users have to have the app permanently using storage space on the phone. I wish there was mobile browsers that managed to store the javascript and static assets more permanently than browsers do now, but not too permanent.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.