> I wish there was a language that was actually multiple levels of compatible languages.
> I wish there was a language that was actually multiple levels of compatible languages. I first read about multi-level programming back in the 80ies and was hooked. Objective-C has bit of this, because the C part is static and pretty low level, but the object-oriented part is dynamic and can go quite high level [1][2]. My own project, Objective-Smalltalk[3] definitely has "multi-levelness" as one of its primary goals. The way to get there is to make the elements of the language malleable, similar to Open Implementation[4], but using a software-architectural frameworks instead of an object-oriented one. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher_order_message [2] http://blog.metaobject.com/2014/05/the-spidy-subset-or-avoid... [3] http://objective.st/ [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_implementation
Posted by mpweiher on Jan 18, 2015, 6:16 PM
Tags
Related issues
- > Clean room.
- I left Gnome 3 for Mate early on and I never looked back, but here are the issues I remember.
- Yay, I found my people… I switch between Android and iPhone every few cycles, and I really do miss my swipe keyboard on Android.
- > LLMs to me are just another tool.
- I used to be one of those people that would countdown the hours to Apple's launch events and tune in for the live stream.
- > "Over the years it has been clear that we in the “open source” camp (as opposed to the “free software” camp) were wrong all along.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments
complaint (SaaS)
> Clean room.
NewI left Gnome 3 for Mate early on and I never looked back, but here are the issues I remember.
Yay, I found my people… I switch between Android and iPhone every few cycles, and I really do miss my swipe keyboard on Android.
> LLMs to me are just another tool.
I used to be one of those people that would countdown the hours to Apple's launch events and tune in for the live stream.
> "Over the years it has been clear that we in the “open source” camp (as opposed to the “free software” camp) were wrong all along.
> So you trusted 22-year-old coffee junkies copying and pasting from stack overflow 10 years ago Absolutely yes...
I don't want to Godwin this thread so early, but you know what analogy I'm thinking of.
> I wish there was a language that was actually multiple levels of compatible languages.
> I wish there was a language that was actually multiple levels of compatible languages. I first read about multi-level programming back in the 80ies and was hooked. Objective-C has bit of this, because the C part is static and pretty low level, but the object-oriented part is dynamic and can go quite high level [1][2]. My own project, Objective-Smalltalk[3] definitely has "multi-levelness" as one of its primary goals. The way to get there is to make the elements of the language malleable, similar to Open Implementation[4], but using a software-architectural frameworks instead of an object-oriented one. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher_order_message [2] http://blog.metaobject.com/2014/05/the-spidy-subset-or-avoid... [3] http://objective.st/ [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_implementation
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.