IssueRaiser

[unstable option] `imports_granularity`

Tracking issue for unstable option: `imports_granularity`. [Option documentation.](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/#imports_granularity) See [Processes.md, "Stabilising an Option"](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/blob/master/Processes.md#stabilising-an-option): - [x] Is the default value correct? - [x] The design and implementation of the option are sound and clean. - [x] The option is well tested, both in unit tests and, optimally, in real usage. - [ ] There is no open bug about the option that prevents its use. - [x] #5269 - [ ] #6028 - [ ] #6027 - [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6666 - [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6717 - [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6191 - [x] #5030 - [x] #4681 - [x] #5253 - [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6164 - [x] #5311 - [ ] #5296 - [x] #4406 - [x] #4536 - [x] #3984 - [x] #3999 - [ ] #6195 - [ ] #6241 - [x] #6243 ## How can I help? We all want this feature merged, and it seems easy enough, but (as with many problems in mature software projects) it's not so simple as writing a few lines of code. Please abstain from leaving "how can I get this stabilized" comments. See @Manishearth's excellent comment below https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4991#issuecomment-3369792412, up-to-date as of August 2026: > Basically: > > - There are open issues that need work. Some need design discussion. > - There are open PRs for so

Posted by 9999years on Sep 15, 2021, 4:51 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,000 issues0 comments

github (SaaS)

[unstable option] `imports_granularity`

9999yearsSep 15, 2021, 4:51 PM

Tracking issue for unstable option: `imports_granularity`. [Option documentation.](https://rust-lang.github.io/rustfmt/#imports_granularity) See [Processes.md, "Stabilising an Option"](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/blob/master/Processes.md#stabilising-an-option): - [x] Is the default value correct? - [x] The design and implementation of the option are sound and clean. - [x] The option is well tested, both in unit tests and, optimally, in real usage. - [ ] There is no open bug about the option that prevents its use. - [x] #5269 - [ ] #6028 - [ ] #6027 - [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6666 - [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6717 - [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6191 - [x] #5030 - [x] #4681 - [x] #5253 - [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/6164 - [x] #5311 - [ ] #5296 - [x] #4406 - [x] #4536 - [x] #3984 - [x] #3999 - [ ] #6195 - [ ] #6241 - [x] #6243 ## How can I help? We all want this feature merged, and it seems easy enough, but (as with many problems in mature software projects) it's not so simple as writing a few lines of code. Please abstain from leaving "how can I get this stabilized" comments. See @Manishearth's excellent comment below https://github.com/rust-lang/rustfmt/issues/4991#issuecomment-3369792412, up-to-date as of August 2026: > Basically: > > - There are open issues that need work. Some need design discussion. > - There are open PRs for so

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue