IssueRaiser

FR: Connect to multiple tailnets simultaneously

(edited by Tailscalar to add context on 2022/09/14) ### What are you trying to do? Log into multiple tailscale accounts at once, on the same device, to access all the machines on both networks simultaneously. **FR to switch between accounts quickly, and _only_ be able to access machines on one tailnet at a time: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/713** --- Original content --- We use Tailscale at work, and I'd like to use Tailscale at home. As such I want to be able to connect to the two networks simultaneously. When I was using `relay-node`, I created two separate systemd services with separate `--tun`s and `--port`s. When I switched to `tailscaled`, I had to work through all of that again, updating my service files to look like the default one. It seems like my solution is probably not the best one. Is there a way that a single `tailscaled` process could manage the two networks?

Posted by kylrth on Mar 12, 2020, 10:33 PM

Tags

Related issues

Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.3,500 issues0 comments

github (Software)

FR: Connect to multiple tailnets simultaneously

kylrthMar 12, 2020, 10:33 PM

(edited by Tailscalar to add context on 2022/09/14) ### What are you trying to do? Log into multiple tailscale accounts at once, on the same device, to access all the machines on both networks simultaneously. **FR to switch between accounts quickly, and _only_ be able to access machines on one tailnet at a time: https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/issues/713** --- Original content --- We use Tailscale at work, and I'd like to use Tailscale at home. As such I want to be able to connect to the two networks simultaneously. When I was using `relay-node`, I created two separate systemd services with separate `--tun`s and `--port`s. When I switched to `tailscaled`, I had to work through all of that again, updating my service files to look like the default one. It seems like my solution is probably not the best one. Is there a way that a single `tailscaled` process could manage the two networks?

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Start the discussion.

Comment on this issue