I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so many (new) projects just NuGet this NuGet that. We have text.json now but I still see people use Newtonsoft JSON. There's old repo's out there that should be archived and deprecated, yet I see new games use it when the repo is very questionable with automated whitespace or comment commits to keep up the appearance that it is still being maintained[0]. Right now I'm working on a Golang project and the dependency tree is a nightmare to say the least, I hope to be able to rip out the parts I don't need and compile it without the massive bulk that I do not need. It's very frustrating to want me to trust the author, who trust the author, who trust the author. When I doubt they even audited or looked at what they imported. [0] https://github.com/sta/websocket-sharp
Posted by Adachi91 on Apr 14, 2026, 6:38 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
- Why is there no link to the source?
- Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
- Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
- Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
- Why is there no simple workaround for this?
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Software)
That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
NewWhy is there no link to the source?
Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Why is there no simple workaround for this?
I have been using https://github.com/jacktasia/dumb-jump to quickly jump to definitions.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so many (new) projects just NuGet this NuGet that. We have text.json now but I still see people use Newtonsoft JSON. There's old repo's out there that should be archived and deprecated, yet I see new games use it when the repo is very questionable with automated whitespace or comment commits to keep up the appearance that it is still being maintained[0]. Right now I'm working on a Golang project and the dependency tree is a nightmare to say the least, I hope to be able to rip out the parts I don't need and compile it without the massive bulk that I do not need. It's very frustrating to want me to trust the author, who trust the author, who trust the author. When I doubt they even audited or looked at what they imported. [0] https://github.com/sta/websocket-sharp
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.