Add supports for `render` in controllers
I published a [gem that adds support for `render` in Rails controllers when using Turbolinks](https://github.com/jorgemanrubia/turbolinks_render). I think this should be officially supported by Turbolinks and I am willing to work on that PR. I would include a comprehensive suite of tests as part of the PR, and I am willing to follow any guideline or consideration you may have. I just don't want to do the work if there is no hope to have it used. As mentioned [in this comment](https://github.com/turbolinks/turbolinks/issues/85#issuecomment-398191163): > I think the situation right now is inconsistent and can be really confusing: > > - Rails 5 adds Turbolinks by default > - Forms are remote by default > - `render` won't work with the defaults mentioned above. > > The fact that forms in scaffolds are generated with `local: true` in Rails 5.2 looks like an smell to me. The vanilla code generated by Rails won't use its own defaults!
Posted by jorgemanrubia on Jun 18, 2018, 8:59 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Add 65536 size support for maps
- TypeScript 7.1 Iteration Plan
- nvim-treeconfig: upstream nvim-treesitter
- Add the "action" and "method" attributes to <button>
- [FEATURE] Support multiple Connector accounts (same connector, different accounts) in Claude and Claude Code on the web (claude.ai/code)
- > We were imposed GitHub for so many exercises!
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.4,000 issues0 comments
support (Software)
Add 65536 size support for maps
TypeScript 7.1 Iteration Plan
nvim-treeconfig: upstream nvim-treesitter
Add the "action" and "method" attributes to <button>
[FEATURE] Support multiple Connector accounts (same connector, different accounts) in Claude and Claude Code on the web (claude.ai/code)
> We were imposed GitHub for so many exercises!
Add support for Visual Studio 2026 Integration
Support for Helm v4
Add supports for `render` in controllers
I published a [gem that adds support for `render` in Rails controllers when using Turbolinks](https://github.com/jorgemanrubia/turbolinks_render). I think this should be officially supported by Turbolinks and I am willing to work on that PR. I would include a comprehensive suite of tests as part of the PR, and I am willing to follow any guideline or consideration you may have. I just don't want to do the work if there is no hope to have it used. As mentioned [in this comment](https://github.com/turbolinks/turbolinks/issues/85#issuecomment-398191163): > I think the situation right now is inconsistent and can be really confusing: > > - Rails 5 adds Turbolinks by default > - Forms are remote by default > - `render` won't work with the defaults mentioned above. > > The fact that forms in scaffolds are generated with `local: true` in Rails 5.2 looks like an smell to me. The vanilla code generated by Rails won't use its own defaults!
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.