[css-ui] Standardize tooltip styling and expose as `::tooltip`
**Edit:** [Resolved](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8930#issuecomment-1644333441) to add to spec on Jul 20, 2023 ---- Now that popover and anchor positioning are moving forwards, I wonder if it’s time to re-examine standardizing tooltip styling and adding a `::tooltip` pseudo-element so that authors can customize it. ## History - The earliest such proposal appears to be [Tantek’s from April 2000](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2000Apr/0014.html). It received [one neutral response](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2000Apr/0044.html) and that was it. - It was [brought up again 2009](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Apr/0225.html). It got no opposition, some support, but very little discussion and no resolution. - [I brought it up again in 2012](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0242.html), which generated some more discussion, but the discussion went on tangents and eventually died. - It was [brought up again in 2017](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0052.html), which also didn't generate much discussion (just one message saying [it doesn’t cover all use cases](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0053.html)). Since 6 years have passed since then, it seems like a good time to discuss it again. Maybe this time it will bear fruit. 😁 ETA: Apparently there was also a [recent Open UI discussion](https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/730) on this with s
Posted by LeaVerou on Jun 7, 2023, 9:20 PM
Tags
Related issues
- This is the biggest problem with contracts, there's simply no way to actually say "please always execute this check".
- I don't disagree with you on this, I worked my whole life in corporate and haven't worked as a OSS maintainer before, though I will _and ...
- the new VSCode UI, looks cute, i don't like it.
- I've been working on my own private harness for the past 8 months, and I've been collecting ideas from such repos I've stumbled upon.
- The way AI is able to interact with outside resources is pretty impressive, but the quality of code it produces to me is still questionab...
- Add PR-style review comments in Git Diff UI that feed into the active agent thread
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,500 issues0 comments
ux (Software)
This is the biggest problem with contracts, there's simply no way to actually say "please always execute this check".
I don't disagree with you on this, I worked my whole life in corporate and haven't worked as a OSS maintainer before, though I will _and ...
the new VSCode UI, looks cute, i don't like it.
I've been working on my own private harness for the past 8 months, and I've been collecting ideas from such repos I've stumbled upon.
The way AI is able to interact with outside resources is pretty impressive, but the quality of code it produces to me is still questionab...
Add PR-style review comments in Git Diff UI that feed into the active agent thread
Thanks for indulging me so far, by the way, I really appreciate this discussion, it's very stimulating.
Migrate GDScript to the GDExtension mechanism and overhaul the implementation
[css-ui] Standardize tooltip styling and expose as `::tooltip`
**Edit:** [Resolved](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8930#issuecomment-1644333441) to add to spec on Jul 20, 2023 ---- Now that popover and anchor positioning are moving forwards, I wonder if it’s time to re-examine standardizing tooltip styling and adding a `::tooltip` pseudo-element so that authors can customize it. ## History - The earliest such proposal appears to be [Tantek’s from April 2000](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2000Apr/0014.html). It received [one neutral response](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2000Apr/0044.html) and that was it. - It was [brought up again 2009](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Apr/0225.html). It got no opposition, some support, but very little discussion and no resolution. - [I brought it up again in 2012](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0242.html), which generated some more discussion, but the discussion went on tangents and eventually died. - It was [brought up again in 2017](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0052.html), which also didn't generate much discussion (just one message saying [it doesn’t cover all use cases](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0053.html)). Since 6 years have passed since then, it seems like a good time to discuss it again. Maybe this time it will bear fruit. 😁 ETA: Apparently there was also a [recent Open UI discussion](https://github.com/openui/open-ui/issues/730) on this with s
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.