Re-write in Typescript 📄
Hi 👋 I'm building a Design System powered by Styled System and would like to have proper Typescript support. I believe that Typescript will provide a better developer experience and better usage of the components. Styled System is not currently written in Typescript, so I'm relying on [@types/styled-system](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/types/styled-system). Although the types are not [fully accurate](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/issues/34794). Are there any plans to re-write Styled System in Typescript? I think this would be the best solution, rather than relying on third party types. Since Typescript would type check the Theme and its values, we could make sure there's a consistent way for developers to use the Theme. The spec is still WIP and there's some open discussion [here](https://github.com/system-ui/theme-specification/issues/1). I've noticed on Spectrum and Twitter that a lot of people love Styled System but also have some concerns with current implementation assumptions. Here's a few examples: - Can we clear the confusion about [multiple variants](https://spectrum.chat/styled-system/general/dealing-with-multiple-variants~b808556e-80e9-4c8e-be3f-dde9ae186c44)? - Should scales be [unitless](https://spectrum.chat/styled-system/general/unitless-scales~dbd3da0b-398b-4498-9b39-4c4bd82165ea)? - Why isn't the `width` supported, but documented in the Theme spec? - Perhaps include better error/warning/deprec
Posted by peduarte on Apr 23, 2019, 9:45 AM
Tags
Related issues
- This is the biggest problem with contracts, there's simply no way to actually say "please always execute this check".
- I don't disagree with you on this, I worked my whole life in corporate and haven't worked as a OSS maintainer before, though I will _and ...
- the new VSCode UI, looks cute, i don't like it.
- I've been working on my own private harness for the past 8 months, and I've been collecting ideas from such repos I've stumbled upon.
- The way AI is able to interact with outside resources is pretty impressive, but the quality of code it produces to me is still questionab...
- Add PR-style review comments in Git Diff UI that feed into the active agent thread
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.4,000 issues0 comments
ux (Software)
This is the biggest problem with contracts, there's simply no way to actually say "please always execute this check".
I don't disagree with you on this, I worked my whole life in corporate and haven't worked as a OSS maintainer before, though I will _and ...
the new VSCode UI, looks cute, i don't like it.
I've been working on my own private harness for the past 8 months, and I've been collecting ideas from such repos I've stumbled upon.
The way AI is able to interact with outside resources is pretty impressive, but the quality of code it produces to me is still questionab...
Add PR-style review comments in Git Diff UI that feed into the active agent thread
Thanks for indulging me so far, by the way, I really appreciate this discussion, it's very stimulating.
Migrate GDScript to the GDExtension mechanism and overhaul the implementation
Re-write in Typescript 📄
Hi 👋 I'm building a Design System powered by Styled System and would like to have proper Typescript support. I believe that Typescript will provide a better developer experience and better usage of the components. Styled System is not currently written in Typescript, so I'm relying on [@types/styled-system](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/master/types/styled-system). Although the types are not [fully accurate](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/issues/34794). Are there any plans to re-write Styled System in Typescript? I think this would be the best solution, rather than relying on third party types. Since Typescript would type check the Theme and its values, we could make sure there's a consistent way for developers to use the Theme. The spec is still WIP and there's some open discussion [here](https://github.com/system-ui/theme-specification/issues/1). I've noticed on Spectrum and Twitter that a lot of people love Styled System but also have some concerns with current implementation assumptions. Here's a few examples: - Can we clear the confusion about [multiple variants](https://spectrum.chat/styled-system/general/dealing-with-multiple-variants~b808556e-80e9-4c8e-be3f-dde9ae186c44)? - Should scales be [unitless](https://spectrum.chat/styled-system/general/unitless-scales~dbd3da0b-398b-4498-9b39-4c4bd82165ea)? - Why isn't the `width` supported, but documented in the Theme spec? - Perhaps include better error/warning/deprec
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.