Feature Request: Add Support for Premium SSD v2 to azurerm_mssql_virtual_machine
### Is there an existing issue for this? - [x] I have searched the existing issues ### Community Note <!--- Please keep this note for the community ---> * Please vote on this issue by adding a :thumbsup: [reaction](https://blog.github.com/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/) to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request * Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request * If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment and review the [contribution guide](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/main/contributing/README.md) to help. <!--- Thank you for keeping this note for the community ---> ### Description ### Why? The Azure SQL IaaS Extension now supports configuring Premium SSD v2 for data and log volumes on SQL Server VMs via the Azure portal and API. This disk type is a significant improvement for I/O-intensive database workloads as it offers: Lower Cost: Generally lower pricing than equivalent Premium SSD (v1) disks. Granular Performance Control: The ability to independently provision and scale IOPS and Throughput (MB/s), decoupled from disk size. This critical feature is currently missing from the azurerm_mssql_virtual_machine resource, which forces users to manually configure storage post-deployment or u
Posted by dajwalia-ms on Oct 14, 2025, 12:08 PM
Tags
Related issues
- > I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
- "Best build quality" is the most important part.
- Historically that rarely happens because industrial equipment is/was generally too expensive for the average worker to purchase on t...
- I can see why they wanted to change the "RISC-V is inevitable" line.
- The GB10 itself is pretty good and I love using mine for broad Linux development.
- > Nothing stops someone from taking the free Windows Vivado and making it run on Linux The EULA and the fact that the linux versior runs...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Sysadmin)
> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
"Best build quality" is the most important part.
Historically that rarely happens because industrial equipment is/was generally too expensive for the average worker to purchase on t...
I can see why they wanted to change the "RISC-V is inevitable" line.
The GB10 itself is pretty good and I love using mine for broad Linux development.
> Nothing stops someone from taking the free Windows Vivado and making it run on Linux The EULA and the fact that the linux versior runs...
Hetzner has some docs: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/additiona...
> too expensive for our internal server needs; not the right fit for our datacenter partners/customers You and me both.
Feature Request: Add Support for Premium SSD v2 to azurerm_mssql_virtual_machine
### Is there an existing issue for this? - [x] I have searched the existing issues ### Community Note <!--- Please keep this note for the community ---> * Please vote on this issue by adding a :thumbsup: [reaction](https://blog.github.com/2016-03-10-add-reactions-to-pull-requests-issues-and-comments/) to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request * Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request * If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment and review the [contribution guide](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/blob/main/contributing/README.md) to help. <!--- Thank you for keeping this note for the community ---> ### Description ### Why? The Azure SQL IaaS Extension now supports configuring Premium SSD v2 for data and log volumes on SQL Server VMs via the Azure portal and API. This disk type is a significant improvement for I/O-intensive database workloads as it offers: Lower Cost: Generally lower pricing than equivalent Premium SSD (v1) disks. Granular Performance Control: The ability to independently provision and scale IOPS and Throughput (MB/s), decoupled from disk size. This critical feature is currently missing from the azurerm_mssql_virtual_machine resource, which forces users to manually configure storage post-deployment or u
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.