I've worked on open+closed source in enterprise startups with people that come from both MSFT- and Linux-centric worlds respectively.
I've worked on open+closed source in enterprise startups with people that come from both MSFT- and Linux-centric worlds respectively. The MSFT centric-people tend (not all) poo-poo open source as a complete waste of time and/or lack of business savviness (helps competitors too much). There is some open source contributions in such shops, but usually only if it helps (and doesn't seem to hurt) the bottom-line. PS: Unfortunately, most Fortune 2000 enterprise (ms and non-ms shops) abuse the fuck out of open source and give zero back (time, $ or help). I really think there should be some "community charge" funding model which doesn't make it nakedly for-profit but rewards people that contribute, maintain and support useful code that is widely deployed so they're not completely abused as unpaid crowdslaves.
Posted by bmir-alum-007 on Jul 24, 2015, 5:18 AM
Tags
Related issues
- > I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
- "Best build quality" is the most important part.
- Historically that rarely happens because industrial equipment is/was generally too expensive for the average worker to purchase on t...
- I can see why they wanted to change the "RISC-V is inevitable" line.
- The GB10 itself is pretty good and I love using mine for broad Linux development.
- > Nothing stops someone from taking the free Windows Vivado and making it run on Linux The EULA and the fact that the linux versior runs...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
pricing (Sysadmin)
> I had the opinion that it'd be too expensive for developers to support offline mode, peer to peer, or community servers after shutdown ...
"Best build quality" is the most important part.
Historically that rarely happens because industrial equipment is/was generally too expensive for the average worker to purchase on t...
I can see why they wanted to change the "RISC-V is inevitable" line.
The GB10 itself is pretty good and I love using mine for broad Linux development.
> Nothing stops someone from taking the free Windows Vivado and making it run on Linux The EULA and the fact that the linux versior runs...
Hetzner has some docs: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/additiona...
> too expensive for our internal server needs; not the right fit for our datacenter partners/customers You and me both.
I've worked on open+closed source in enterprise startups with people that come from both MSFT- and Linux-centric worlds respectively.
I've worked on open+closed source in enterprise startups with people that come from both MSFT- and Linux-centric worlds respectively. The MSFT centric-people tend (not all) poo-poo open source as a complete waste of time and/or lack of business savviness (helps competitors too much). There is some open source contributions in such shops, but usually only if it helps (and doesn't seem to hurt) the bottom-line. PS: Unfortunately, most Fortune 2000 enterprise (ms and non-ms shops) abuse the fuck out of open source and give zero back (time, $ or help). I really think there should be some "community charge" funding model which doesn't make it nakedly for-profit but rewards people that contribute, maintain and support useful code that is widely deployed so they're not completely abused as unpaid crowdslaves.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.