But why is there no such pushback agains linux kernel?
But why is there no such pushback agains linux kernel? What makes that monolith you cannot customize different enough from systemd? What if I don't want to use in-kernel usb stack, or audit, or key management, or LSM modules, or ELF binfmt support, or filesystems — you are forced by the distro to use all those features. Yet with systemd it's somehow different. I'm genuinely curious
Posted by 112233 on Jan 29, 2026, 3:27 PM
Tags
Related issues
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
support (Sysadmin)
Support connecting to remote devcontainers (devcontainer on remote host)
Option to use Waffle menu or links displayed normally
I also attempted to package ROCM on musl.
But why is there no such pushback agains linux kernel?
OpenCode Support
Upcoming changes to the tado° API
Allow Mac users to use Apple native containerization
Support for the Containerization Framework on macOS
But why is there no such pushback agains linux kernel?
But why is there no such pushback agains linux kernel? What makes that monolith you cannot customize different enough from systemd? What if I don't want to use in-kernel usb stack, or audit, or key management, or LSM modules, or ELF binfmt support, or filesystems — you are forced by the distro to use all those features. Yet with systemd it's somehow different. I'm genuinely curious
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.