The first thing that came to mind was Beezid.
The first thing that came to mind was Beezid. Basically we'll end up with countless teams of researchers attempting to solve problems and only a tiny fraction of them being paid for their time. I agree with the article and propose that we should be doing the exact opposite - finding a way to fund more garage tinkerers. Just add up the risk of failure in tech (at least 90%), the fact that so much of our daily workday is broken up into frivolous minutia, and that researchers spend on the order of half their time fundraising. It should be obvious that the problem is underemployment, and that the way to remedy that is to go from top-down to bottom-up organizational structures. In other words, recognize the dignity of work and not just the financial outcome.
Posted by zackmorris on Jul 27, 2015, 3:07 PM
Tags
Related issues
- Huh, this is not my experience.
- For some reason an Azure outage does not faze me in the same way that an AWS outage does.
- The triplet of wind, pole, dragon appears multiple times in the same order, so is possibly a single phrase that has been broken up into t...
- Option to skip refreshing resource instances whose configuration hasn't changed since the last apply
- [YouTube] Unable to extract uploader id
- Add ability to prioritize GitHub Action runners
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,000 issues0 comments
reliability (E-commerce)
Huh, this is not my experience.
For some reason an Azure outage does not faze me in the same way that an AWS outage does.
The triplet of wind, pole, dragon appears multiple times in the same order, so is possibly a single phrase that has been broken up into t...
Option to skip refreshing resource instances whose configuration hasn't changed since the last apply
[YouTube] Unable to extract uploader id
Add ability to prioritize GitHub Action runners
Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020) (1250410)
Codegen collaboration with Apollo Codegen and GraphQL Code Generator
The first thing that came to mind was Beezid.
The first thing that came to mind was Beezid. Basically we'll end up with countless teams of researchers attempting to solve problems and only a tiny fraction of them being paid for their time. I agree with the article and propose that we should be doing the exact opposite - finding a way to fund more garage tinkerers. Just add up the risk of failure in tech (at least 90%), the fact that so much of our daily workday is broken up into frivolous minutia, and that researchers spend on the order of half their time fundraising. It should be obvious that the problem is underemployment, and that the way to remedy that is to go from top-down to bottom-up organizational structures. In other words, recognize the dignity of work and not just the financial outcome.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.