> Also, it's sort of odd that it was directed to pg, considering pg has made exactly one comment on HN in the last year.
> Also, it's sort of odd that it was directed to pg, considering pg has made exactly one comment on HN in the last year. That's pretty much the point Zed was making, in an off-kilter way. Zed is all about real names, taking responsibility for things by putting your name on what you say, talking to people in real life to settle disputes because people aren't empathetic enough online, etc. The abusive comments on HN need to be "blamed" on someone. Someone has to take responsibility for them. If there's no way to blame the commenters themselves, then the most obvious thing to do is to blame the person under whose aegis those comments receive the protection of anonymity. PG has the ultimate authority (or near-enough) to change HN such that anonymous untracable abuse is no longer possible through it. Thus, he's responsible for not having done so. ...is, I guess, the logic.
Posted by derefr on Jun 1, 2015, 8:02 AM
Tags
Related issues
- I had a similar random thought: Why don't we have a cloud company that does something opposite to what a Cloud company usually does.
- China is controlled by the government.
- > Prohibition never works, and piracy is a reflection of an unmet need.
- Thanks, that's quite interesting.
- My experience is that people are getting increasingly isolated anyway, so VR is great in this regard for more and more people.
- You misinterpreted the summary.
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.6,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Housing)
I had a similar random thought: Why don't we have a cloud company that does something opposite to what a Cloud company usually does.
China is controlled by the government.
> Prohibition never works, and piracy is a reflection of an unmet need.
Thanks, that's quite interesting.
My experience is that people are getting increasingly isolated anyway, so VR is great in this regard for more and more people.
You misinterpreted the summary.
> The biggest unmet need is housing, and in most areas that is definitely supply constrained.
> why should I not vote to block and prevent this growth?
> Also, it's sort of odd that it was directed to pg, considering pg has made exactly one comment on HN in the last year.
> Also, it's sort of odd that it was directed to pg, considering pg has made exactly one comment on HN in the last year. That's pretty much the point Zed was making, in an off-kilter way. Zed is all about real names, taking responsibility for things by putting your name on what you say, talking to people in real life to settle disputes because people aren't empathetic enough online, etc. The abusive comments on HN need to be "blamed" on someone. Someone has to take responsibility for them. If there's no way to blame the commenters themselves, then the most obvious thing to do is to blame the person under whose aegis those comments receive the protection of anonymity. PG has the ultimate authority (or near-enough) to change HN such that anonymous untracable abuse is no longer possible through it. Thus, he's responsible for not having done so. ...is, I guess, the logic.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.