First: this document should be on github.
First: this document should be on github. How do I do a PR on a google doc? My biggest problem with this proposal is that it will force a full-blown code-style on you. Many, perhaps most, of the features will be part of the common consent how to write good apps but I am sure lots of people have a problem with feature x or y. I wonder if a "selecting a subset" would be practicable.
Posted by leichtgewicht on Mar 12, 2015, 8:34 AM
Tags
Related issues
- That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
- Why is there no link to the source?
- Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
- Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
- Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
- I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Software)
That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
Why is there no link to the source?
Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Why is there no simple workaround for this?
I have been using https://github.com/jacktasia/dumb-jump to quickly jump to definitions.
First: this document should be on github.
First: this document should be on github. How do I do a PR on a google doc? My biggest problem with this proposal is that it will force a full-blown code-style on you. Many, perhaps most, of the features will be part of the common consent how to write good apps but I am sure lots of people have a problem with feature x or y. I wonder if a "selecting a subset" would be practicable.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.