> Humans don't try to achieve such goals because we obviously can't and we need others We don't need all those others.
> Humans don't try to achieve such goals because we obviously can't and we need others We don't need all those others. In fact, we actually need far fewer than all the others out there. With the exception of a few lunatics here and there throughout history, human beings don't make it their business to exterminate the rest of humanity. It's a waste of time. We only compete with a small group of humans at any one time. Similarly, AIs whose interests don't overlap would have no interest in destroying other AIs. So I find it extremely likely that there would be a multitude of AIs, in the unlikely event that AIs come into fruition. Also, competition isn't constant for humans. One minute you're competing, another you're cooperating, and another you're ignoring. The same dynamism can be expected with AIs.
Posted by maratd on Jan 30, 2015, 8:49 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
- Why is there no link to the source?
- Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
- Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
- Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
- I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Software)
That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
Why is there no link to the source?
Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Why is there no simple workaround for this?
I have been using https://github.com/jacktasia/dumb-jump to quickly jump to definitions.
> Humans don't try to achieve such goals because we obviously can't and we need others We don't need all those others.
> Humans don't try to achieve such goals because we obviously can't and we need others We don't need all those others. In fact, we actually need far fewer than all the others out there. With the exception of a few lunatics here and there throughout history, human beings don't make it their business to exterminate the rest of humanity. It's a waste of time. We only compete with a small group of humans at any one time. Similarly, AIs whose interests don't overlap would have no interest in destroying other AIs. So I find it extremely likely that there would be a multitude of AIs, in the unlikely event that AIs come into fruition. Also, competition isn't constant for humans. One minute you're competing, another you're cooperating, and another you're ignoring. The same dynamism can be expected with AIs.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.